Is Razing or Keeping Cities Better in Civ 6? Insights for Strategic Gameplay

Discover whether it's better to raze or keep cities in Civ 6 for optimal strategy in your empire-building game.

98 views

Razing a city in Civ 6 can be useful if it's unsustainable, strategically weak, or culturally different, reducing dissent. Keeping a city boosts resources, expands territory, and strengthens your empire over time. Assess the city's strategic value and your nation's needs to decide.

FAQs & Answers

  1. What factors should I consider before razing a city in Civ 6? Evaluate the city's strategic value, sustainability, and how it aligns with your empire's goals before deciding to raze.
  2. How does keeping a city benefit my Civ 6 gameplay? Keeping a city can provide valuable resources, expand territory, and strengthen your empire over time.
  3. What are the consequences of razing a city in Civ 6? Razing a city can reduce dissent but may also diminish the resources and potential growth of your empire.
  4. When is it beneficial to adopt a razing strategy in Civ 6? Razing is beneficial when the city is strategically weak, culturally different, or unsustainable within your empire.

Watch More

For more insights on Civ 6 strategies, check out our guides on city management and resource optimization to enhance your gameplay experience.

  1. Should You Raze Cities in Civ 6? Strategic Considerations Explained Explore the pros and cons of razing cities in Civ 6 and make strategic decisions for your gameplay.
  2. Should You Spare Regala? Key Considerations for Your Decision Explore the moral implications of sparing Regala. Weigh your values with our insights for informed decision-making.